@article {1246,
	title = {Anura II. Engystomatidae},
	journal = {Das Tierreich},
	volume = {49},
	year = {1926},
	pages = {1-110},
	author = {Nieden, F.}
}
@book {1029,
	title = {A Monograph of the Frogs of the Family Microhylidae},
	year = {1934},
	publisher = {Trustees of the British Museum},
	organization = {Trustees of the British Museum},
	address = {London},
	author = {Parker, H.W.}
}
@article {598,
	title = {New reptiles and amphibians from Tanganika Territory and Kenya colony},
	journal = {Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology},
	volume = {LXXII},
	year = {1932},
	pages = {373-387},
	author = {Loveridge, Arthur}
}
@article {820,
	title = {A comparative study of the herpetological faunae of the Uluguru and Usambara Mountains, Tanganyika Territory with descriptions of new species},
	journal = {Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology},
	volume = {L},
	year = {1928},
	pages = {85-265},
	author = {Barbour, Thomas and Loveridge, A.}
}
@article {1030,
	title = {A new genus and species of brevicipitine frog (Amphibia, Anura, Microhylidae) from high altitude in the mountains of Ethiopia},
	journal = {Tropical Zoology},
	volume = {2},
	year = {1989},
	pages = {13-30},
	author = {Largen, M.J. and Drewes, R. C.}
}
@book {279,
	title = {Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae},
	series = {McDiarmid, Roy W},
	volume = {[Author], Altig, Ronald [Author]},
	year = {1999},
	month = {Tadpoles: The bi},
	pages = {Series Information Tadpoles The biology of anuran larvae},
	abstract = {This text on tadpole biology has 12 chapters written by leading experts on the subject. Chapters cover the morphology, development, behavior, ecology, environmental physiology, evolution, and biodiversity of the organisms. Author, subject, and taxonomic indexes; a glossary of terms used in the text; and a bibliography with more than 2500 citations accompany the work. Herpetologists, developmental biologists, comparative vertebrate anatomists, and ecologists will find this volume useful.},
	author = {McDiarmid, Roy W. and Altig, Ronald}
}
@article {1245,
	title = {Probreviceps loveridgei, Probreviceps uluguruensis and Probreviceps macrodactylus (Loveridge{\textquoteright}s forest frog, Uluguru forest frog, long-fingered forest frog) advertisement calls},
	journal = {Herpetological Review},
	volume = {35},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {261-262},
	author = {Mkonyi, F.J. and Ngalason, W. and Msuya, C.A. and Howell, K. M. and Channing, A.}
}
@article {260,
	title = {Phylogenetic relationships of African microhylid frogs inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes},
	journal = {Organisms Diversity \& Evolution},
	volume = {4},
	number = {4},
	year = {2004},
	month = {2004},
	pages = {227-235},
	abstract = {<p>The phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs are poorly understood. The first molecular phylogeny for continental African microhylids is presented, including representatives of all subfamilies, six of the eight genera, and the enigmatic hemisotid Hemisus. Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA sequence data were analysed using parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian methods. Analyses of the data are consistent with the monophyly of all sampled subfamilies and genera. Hemisus does not nest within either brevicipitines or non-brevicipitines. It is possibly the sister group to brevicipitines, in which case brevicipitines might not be microhylids. Phrynomantis and Hoplophryne potentially group with non-African, non-brevicipitine microhylids, in agreement with recent morphological and molecular data. Within brevicipitines, Breviceps is recovered as the sister group to a clade of Callulina + Spelaeophryne + Probreviceps. The relationships among the genera within this latter clade are unclear, being sensitive to the method of analysis. Optimal trees suggest the Probreviceps macrodactylus subspecies complex might be paraphyletic with respect to P. uluguruensis, corroborating preliminary morphological studies indicating that P. m. rungwensis may be a distinct species. P. m. loveridgei may be paraphyletic with respect to P. m. macrodactylus, though this is not strongly supported. Some biogeographic hypotheses are examined in light of these findings. Copyright 2004 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</p>
},
	url = {<Go to ISI>://PREV200500144666},
	author = {Loader, S.P. and Gower, D.J. and Howell, K. M. and Doggart, N. and R{\"o}del, Mark-Oliver and Clarke, B. T. and De Sa, R. O. and Cohen, B.L. and Wilkinson, M.}
}
@article {1027,
	title = {A new species of Probreviceps (Amphibia: Anura) from the Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania},
	journal = {Zootaxa},
	volume = {1237},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {45-60},
	author = {Loader, S.P. and Channing, A. and Menegon, M. and Davenport, T.R.}
}
@book {706,
	title = {Field Guide to Amphibians of the Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests of Tanzania and Kenya},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {320},
	publisher = {Camerapix Publishers International},
	organization = {Camerapix Publishers International},
	address = {Nairobi, Kenya},
	author = {Harper, E.B. and Measey, G.J. and Patrick, D.A. and Menegon, M. and Vonesh, J.R.}
}
